Fact Sheets

FICHES DE
RENSEIGNEMENTS

Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv.

Family :

Famille :

Poaceae

Synonym(s) :

Synonyme(s) :

Panicum viride L. (basionym) (USDA-ARS 2024)
Chaetochloa viridis (L.) Scribn. (CABI 2021; POWO 2024; USDA-ARS 2024)
Chamaeraphis viridis (L.) Millsp. (CABI 2021; POWO 2024; USDA-ARS 2024)
Ixophorus viridis (L.) Nash (CABI 2021; POWO 2024)
Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv. subsp. viridis (L.) Thell. (POWO 2024; USDA-ARS 2024)
Panicum pachystachys Franch. & Sav. (USDA-ARS 2024)
Setaria pachystachys (Franch. & Sav.) Matsum. (USDA-ARS 2024)
Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. subsp. pachystachys (Franch. & Sav.) Masam. & Yanagita (USDA-ARS 2024)

Common Name(s) :

Nom(s) commun(s) :

Green foxtail

(English) (AOSA 2024; Darbyshire 2003; USDA-ARS 2024)
Green bristlegrass (English) (Barkworth et al. 2003; DiTomaso and Healy 2007; CABI 2021; USDA-NRCS 2024)
Green pigeongrass (English) (CABI 2021; ALA 2024)
Bottlegrass (English) (DiTomaso and Healy 2007)
Sétaire verte (French) (Rehm 1994; Barkworth et al. 2003; Darbyshire 2003)
Grüne Borstenhirse (German) (Rehm 1994)
Capim-verde (Portuguese) (CABI 2021)
Milha-verde (Portuguese) (Rehm 1994; CABI 2021)
Almorejo (Spanish) (Rehm 1994)
Almoralejo (Spanish) (CABI 2021)
Almorejo verde (Spanish) (CABI 2021)
Gou wei cao (transcribe Chinese 狗尾草)(eFloras 2004)

  • Setaria viridis (green foxtail) florets and spikelet

  • Setaria viridis (green foxtail) spikelet

  • Setaria viridis (green foxtail) floret, palea view

  • Setaria viridis (green foxtail) floret, lemma view

  • Setaria viridis (green foxtail) floret; side view

Explore More :

Explore plus :

Overview

Aperçu

Regulation :

Remarques Réglementation:

    Regulation Notes:

    • Setaria viridis is on the lists of harmful organisms for Ecuador and Guatemala (USDA-PCIT-PExD 2024) (*may be updated without notice).

    Distribution :

    Répartition :

    Setaria viridis is native to southern Europe, northern Africa, much of Temperate Asia, and Australia, and is naturalized in northern and northeastern Europe, North America, part of Central America, and much of South America (POWO 2024; USDA-ARS 2024).

    Habitat and Crop Association :

    Habitat et Cultures Associées :

    Setaria viridis is a weedy species tolerant of a wide range of environment conditions (DiTomaso and Healy 2007). It can be found in agricultural fields, orchards, vineyards, and gardens, as well as roadsides, ditch banks, disturbed areas, and waste places, primarily in temperate and subtropical regions (DiTomaso and Healy 2007; CABI 2021; eFloras 2024).

    Setaria viridis is a serious or principal weed in several countries (Holm et al. 1977; CABI 2021). It is a troublesome weed in Beta vulgaris L. subsp. vulgaris (sugar beet), Gossypium spp. L. (cotton), Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower), Hordeum vulgare L. (barley), Oryza sativa L. (rice), Triticum aestivum L. (wheat), Zea mays L. (maize), as well as a variety of other agricultural and vegetable crops (Holm et al. 1977; CABI 2021).

    Economic Use, cultivation area, and Weed Association :

    Utilisation économique, zone de culture et association de mauvaises herbes :

    Duration of Life Cycle :

    Durée du cycle vital:

    Annual

    Dispersal Unit Type :

    Type d’unité de dispersion :

    Spikelet, floret, caryopsis

    General Information

    RENSEIGNEMENTS GÉNÉRAUX

    Setaria is a genus of about 140 species found primarily in tropical and warm-temperate regions (Barkworth et al. 2003). Reproduction in S. viridis occurs only by the seed (i.e., caryopsis bearing spikelet). Each plant can produce hundreds to thousands of seeds (Barkworth et al. 2003) that are capable of germinating after a brief dormancy of a few weeks (CABI 2021). Seed viability in soil may last as long as 15 – 21 years depending on the depth of burial (CABI 2021). Once dispersed from the plant, seeds can spread via wind, water, animal, contaminated farm or earth moving equipment, or as a seed lot contaminant. Seeds of S. viridis can survive passage through the digestive systems of livestock (CABI 2021).

    Setaria viridis is subdivided by some authors into several subspecies or varieties based on vegetative, inflorescence features, and seed production rates; however, the spikelets are considered indistinguishable among the subspecific taxa (Barkworth et al. 2003; CABI 2021; eFloras 2024).

    Although S. viridis is susceptible to a wide variety of common herbicides, herbicide resistant populations of S. viridis to one or more types of herbicides have been reported in Europe, Canada, and the United States (CABI 2021).

    .

    Setaria viridis infestation in Kobe City, Japan. Photo by harum.koh CC BY-SA 2.0, Wikimedia.

    Identification

    Identification

    <
    >
    • Spikelet

      Size

      • Spikelet length*: 2.1 – 2.4 (average 2.3) mm; width*: 1.1 – 1.3 mm (average 1.26 mm).
      • Lower (1st) glume length*: 0.9 – 1.2 mm (average 1.1 mm), one-quarter to one-half the length of the spikelet.
      • Upper (2nd) glume nearly equal to length of spikelet.
      *Note: minimum and maximum based on a random selection of 10 spikelets in normal range of this species using image measurement protocol (ISMA 2020). CDA-S-25298

      Measurements from the literature:
      • Spikelet length: 1.8 – 2.2 mm (Tutin et al. 1980; Barkworth et al. 2003).
      • Spikelet length: 2 – 2.5 mm (eFloras 2024).
      • Spikelet length: 2 mm; width: 1 – 1.25 mm (Musil 1963).

      Shape

      • Spikelet oval to egg-shaped; dorsoventrally compressed, one side slightly arched and the other side flat (planoconvex, D-shaped in lateral view)
      • Lower (1st) glume broadly triangular, the outer corners wrapping around the base of the upper glume.
      • Upper (2nd) glume egg-shaped.

      Surface Texture

      • Texture of glumes thin and papery.
      • Lower (1st) glume 3-nerved.
      • Upper (2nd) glume 5-nerved.

      Colour

      • Glumes pale green to whitish-yellow coloured.

      Other Features

      • The spikelet consists of a pair of glumes, one sterile floret, and one fertile floret.
      • Disarticulation occurs below the glumes; the spikelet falls as a unit from the plant.
    • Sterile floret

      Size

      • Sterile lemma equal to length of spikelet or slightly longer.
      • Sterile palea about one-half the length of sterile lemma.

      Shape

      • Sterile lemma oval to egg-shaped.

      Surface Texture

      • Sterile lemma thin and papery, similar to the glumes.
      • Sterile lemma 5-nerved.
      • Sterile palea membranous and translucent.

      Colour

      • Glumes pale green to whitish-yellow coloured.

      Other Features

      • Awnless.
    • Fertile floret

      Size

      • Fertile floret length: 2 mm; width: 1.0 – 1.25 mm (Musil 1963).

      Shape

      • Fertile floret oval to egg-shaped in outline, dorsoventrally compressed, slightly arched on lemma side and nearly flat on palea side in lateral view (planoconvex).
      • Fertile lemma tip is broadly angled (obtuse).
      • Fertile lemma margins in-rolled over palea margins.

      Surface Texture

      • Fertile lemma hardened, minutely tuberculate over entire surface, dull, 5-nerved.
      • Fertile palea hardened, 2-nerved, minutely tuberculate between keels, smooth and glossy from the keels to the margin.

      Colour

      • Fertile lemma and palea greenish-yellow, yellow, or light brown, often with darker brown mottling; nerves, if visible, a lighter shade than the base color.

      Other Features

      • Fertile floret does not have an awn.
    • Caryopsis

      Size

      • Caryopsis length*: 1.45 – 1.6 mm (average 1.5 mm); width*: 1.0 – 1.2 mm (average 1.1 mm).
      *Note: minimum and maximum based on a random selection of 8 caryopses in normal range of this species using image measurement protocol (ISMA 2020). CDA-S-25298

      Shape

      • Caryopsis oval to egg-shaped in outline, dorsoventrally compressed.

      Surface Texture

      • Caryopsis texture smooth.

      Colour

      • Caryopsis is dull, greyish or greenish coloured.

      Other Features

      • Hilum is a dark, round to oval spot near base of caryopsis on the side opposite the embryo.
    <
    >
    <
    >
    • Embryo

      Size

      • Embryo length*: 1.15 – 1.31 mm (average 1.26 mm); width*: 0.6 – 0.7 mm (average 0.66 mm).
      • Embryo about four-fifths the length of the caryopsis.
      *Note: minimum and maximum based on a random selection of 8 embryos in normal range of this species using image measurement protocol (ISMA 2020). CDA-S-25298

      Shape

      • Embryo egg-shaped in outline.

      Endosperm

      • Endosperm solid (Terrell 1977).

      Other Features

      • Embryo in lateral position (Martin 1946).

    Identification Tips

    CONSEILS POUR L’IDENTIFICATION

    Setaria viridis is in the Paniceae tribe of Poaceae (Barkworth et al. 2003).

    • The dispersal unit is a spikelet that has two florets, one sterile and one fertile.
    • The spikelet is egg-shaped or teardrop-shaped in outline.
    • The thin papery glumes are unequal in length.
    • The lower (1st) glume is somewhat triangular, and wraps around the upper (2nd) glume, and is one-half or less as long as the spikelet.
    • The upper (2nd) glume and the sterile floret lemma are as long as the spikelet and are similar in texture.
    • The fertile floret lemma and palea are hardened.
    • The fertile lemma surface is roughened with fine tubercles. The palea is similar in texture in the center and is smooth and shiny near the margins.

    Additional Botany Information

    AUTRES RENSEIGNEMENTS BOTANIQUES

    Flowers/Inflorescence

    • The inflorescence is a spike-like panicle, cylindrical, up to 20 cm long and 1 cm wide, usually erect or nodding slightly near the tip (Tutin et al. 1980; Barkworth et al. 2003; CABI 2021).
    • Panicle branches are very short, each bearing several densely packed spikelets (Tutin et al. 1980).
    • Each spikelet is subtended by 1 – 3 (7) awn-like bristles (Tutin et al. 1980; Barkworth et al. 2003, eFloras 2024).
    • The bristles are 5 – 10 mm long, antrorsely barbed (i.e., barbs are pointed toward the tip of the bristle), and are usually green, sometimes purple (Tutin et al. 1980; Barkworth et al. 2003; CABI 2021).
    • Mature spikelets break away from the plant as a unit while the bristles remain attached to the plant (Tutin et al. 1980; CABI 2021).

    Vegetative Features

    • Plants forming tufts with many erect stems (CABI 2021).
    • Stems up to 250 cm tall (Barkworth et al. 2003).
    • Stems slightly flattened in cross-section (DiTomaso and Healy 2007).
    • Roots are fibrous (Holm et al. 1977).
    • Leaf sheaths usually glabrous, except with ciliate hairs on the margins (Barkworth et al. 2003; DiTomaso and Healy 2007).
    • Ligules a fringe of hairs, 1 – 2 mm long, and fused at the base (CABI 2021).
    • Leaf blades flat, up to 20 cm long and 4 – 25 mm wide (Barkworth et al. 2003). Upper surface rough to the touch, lower surface smooth (Holm et al. 1977).

    Similar Species

    ESPÈCES SEMBLABLES

    Similar species are based on a study of seed morphology of various species, and those with similar dispersal units are identified. The study is limited by physical specimen and literature availability at the time of examination, and possibly impacted by the subjectivity of the authors based on their knowledge and experience. Providing similar species information for seed identification is to make users aware of similarities that could possibly result in misidentification.

    Setaria faberi R. A. W. Herrm.
    Giant foxtail (Darbyshire 2003; AOSA 2024)
    Chinese foxtail (Barkworth et al. 2003)
    Japanese bristlegrass (USDA-NRCS 2024)
    Nodding bristle grass (USDA-ARS 2024)

    • Spikelets of S. faberi are usually 2.5 to 3 mm long (Barkworth et al. 2003), somewhat pointed at the tip, and distinctly humped in profile view, whereas S. viridis spikelets are usually smaller (less than 2.5 mm long), more broadly angled at the tip, and flatter in profile view.
    • The upper (2nd) glume in S. faberi is three-quarters the length of the spikelet or less and the upper portion of the fertile lemma is exposed, while in S. viridis the upper glume is nearly the same length as the spikelet and completely conceals the fertile lemma.
    • The tuberculate texture of the fertile floret lemma in S. faberi is transversely ridged in the lower two-thirds, whereas in S. viridis it is not ridged.

    Setaria italica (L.) P. Beauv.
    Foxtail millet (Barkworth et al. 2003; AOSA 2024; USDA-NRCS 2024)
    Italian millet (AOSA 2024)

    • The spikelets of S. italica tend to be longer and wider (2 – 3 mm long; 1.5 mm wide; Musil 1963; Barkworth et al. 2003) than those of S. viridis (2.1 – 2.4 mm long; 1.1 – 1.3 mm wide).
    • The upper (2nd) glume is only about three-quarters the length of the spikelet in S. italica, whereas in S. viridis the upper glume is nearly equal in length to the spikelet (Musil 1963).
    • The fertile floret in S. italica can be light yellow to dark golden yellow, orange, or purplish-brown depending on the variety and the lemma nerves are inconspicuous, while in S. viridis the fertile floret is greenish-yellow to light brown, often with darker brown mottling and the lemma nerves are lighter in color.
    • In S. italica the fertile florets fall from the plant leaving the glumes, sterile floret, and subtending bristles attached to the plant, whereas in S. viridis the entire spikelet falls as a unit from the plant (CABI 2021).

    Setaria parviflora (Poir.) Kerguélen
    Knotroot bristlegrass (AOSA 2024)
    Knotroot foxtail (Wiersema and León 1999)
    Marsh bristlegrass (USDA-NRCS 2024)
    Slender pigeon grass (ALA 2024)

    • The spikelets of S. parviflora can be slightly longer (2 – 2.8 mm; Barkworth et al. 2003), compared to S. viridis (2.1 – 2.4 mm), but are similar in width (1.1 – 1.3 mm wide) (Walters 2011).
    • In S. parviflora the upper (2nd) glume is one-half to two-thirds the length of the spikelet and the upper portion of the fertile lemma is exposed, while in S. viridis the fertile lemma is concealed by the upper glume.
    • The fertile floret lemma in S. parviflora is pointed, while it is broadly angled (obtuse) in S. viridis.
    • The fertile lemma in S. parviflora is transversely ridged, while in S. viridis it is not ridged.
    • The glossy margins of the fertile palea are concealed by the in-rolled lemma margins in S. parviflora, whereas in S. viridis the glossy palea margins are exposed.

    Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. subsp. pumila
    Yellow foxtail (AOSA 2024; USDA-NRCS 2024)
    Yellow bristlegrass (AOSA 2024)
    Pale pigeon grass (ALA 2024)

    • Spikelets of S. pumila subsp. pumila are generally larger (2 – 3.5 mm long; Barkworth et al. 2003; eFloras 2024) and distinctly humped in profile view, whereas S. viridis spikelets are usually smaller (less than 2.5 mm long) and flatter in profile view.
    • The upper (2nd) glume in S. pumila subsp. pumila is about one-half the length of the spikelet and the upper portion of the fertile lemma is exposed, while in S. viridis the upper glume is nearly the same length as the spikelet and completely conceals the fertile lemma.
    • The fertile floret lemma in S. pumila subsp. pumila is transversely ridged, while in S. viridis it is not ridged.
    • The glossy margins of the fertile floret palea are concealed by the strongly in-rolled lemma margins in S. pumila subsp. pumila, whereas in S. viridis the glossy palea margins are exposed.

    Setaria verticillata (L.) P. Beauv.
    Hooked bristlegrass (Barkworth et al. 2003; USDA-NRCS 2024)
    Bur bristlegrass (AOSA 2024)
    Bristly foxtail (DiTomaso and Healy 2007).
    Whorled pigeon grass (ALA 2024)

    • Spikelets of S. verticillata are similar in size and shape to those of S. viridis and are considered indistinguishable (Musil 1963). The tips of the spikelet and fertile floret lemma in S. verticillata are slightly more pointed than in S. viridis (Walters 2011), but this is not a reliable distinction.
    • The bristles subtending each spikelet in S. verticillata are retrorsely barbed (barbs downward pointing), hence the common names of hooked or bur bristlegrass because the bristles tend to catch on clothing or fur, as opposed to the antrorsely barbed bristles (barbs pointing toward bristle tip) subtending each spikelet in S. viridis that do not stick to clothing or fur (Barkworth et al. 2003; DiTomaso and Healy 2007; CABI 2024).

    Click to select species

    Cliquez pour sélectionner les espèces

    Comparison Window

    Fenêtre de comparaison

    Need ID Help?

    Besoin d’aide pour l’identification?

    Reference(s)

    Référence(s)

    Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA). 2024. Rules for Testing Seeds. Vol. 3: Uniform Classification of Weed and Crop Seeds. Association of Official Seed Analysts, Wichita, Kansas.

    Atlas of Living Australia (ALA). 2024. Website at  https://www.ala.org.au/ Accessed October 7, 2024.

    Barkworth, M. E., Capels, K. M., Long, S., and Piep, M. B. 2003. Flora of North America. Vol. 25, Magnoliophyta: Commelinidae (in part): Poaceae, part 2. Oxford University Press.

    Center for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI). 2021 Setaria viridis (green foxtail). In: CABI Compendium. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. https://doi.org/10.1079/cabicompendium.49776  Accessed October 8, 2024.

    Darbyshire, S. J. 2003. Inventory of Canadian Agricultural Weeds Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 48.

    DiTomaso, J. M. and Healy, E. A. 2007. Weeds of California and Other Western States. Vol. 2: Geraniaceae – Zygophyllaceae. Agriculture and Natural Resources Publication 3488. University of California, Oakland, CA.

    eFloras. 2024. Flora of China. Setaria. http://www.efloras.org/florataxon.aspx?flora_id=2&taxon_id=130214  Accessed October 13, 2024.

    Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. The University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI.

    International Seed Morphology Association (ISMA). 2020. Method for seed size measurement. Version 1.0. ISMA Publication Guide. https://www.idseed.org/authors/details/method_for_seed_size_measurement.html

    Martin, A. C. 1946. The comparative internal morphology of seeds. The American Midland Naturalist 36(3):513-660.

    Musil, A. F. 1963. Identification of Crop and Weed Seeds. Agriculture Handbook No. 219. United States Department of Agriculture. Washington D.C.

    Plants of the World Online (POWO). 2024. Facilitated by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. https://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/  Accessed October 8, 2024.

    Rehm, S. (ed.) 1994. Multilingual Dictionary of Agronomic Plants. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Terrell, E. E. 1971. Survey of occurrences of liquid or soft endosperm in grass genera. Bull. Torr. Botan. Club 98(5):264-268.

    Tutin, T. G., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N. A., Moore, D. M., Valentine, D. H., Walters, S. M., and Webb, D. A. (eds.). 1980. Flora Europaea. Volume 5, Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Cambridge University Press.

    United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Services (USDA-ARS). 2024. Germplasm Resources Information Network (GRIN), https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxon/taxonomysearch Accessed October 07, 2024.

    United States Department of Agriculture-Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 2024. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC USA. https://plants.usda.gov/home Accessed October 7, 2024.

    United States Department of Agriculture – Phytosanitary Certificate Issuance and Tracking System (USDA-PCIT). 2024. https://pcit.aphis.usda.gov/PExD/faces/ViewPExD.jsf Accessed October 7, 2024.

    Walters, D.S. 2011. Identification Tool to Weed Disseminules of California Central Valley Table Grape Production Areas. USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST Identification Technology Program, Fort Collins, CO. http://idtools.org/id/table_grape/weed-tool/ Accessed October 13, 2024.

    Wiersema, J. H. and León, B. 1999. World Economic Plants: A Standard Reference. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.

    Author(s)

    AUTEUR(S)

    Deborah J. Lionakis Meyer, California Department of Food and Agriculture (retired).

    Acknowledgment

    The author wishes to thank the following from the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA): reviewer Jennifer Neudorf for her review and suggestions for fact sheet improvement. Thank you to Lyrae Willis for her images and image selection in the General Information and Additional Botany sections.